Lost all files

SOLARIS7: SPACESHIP TECHNICAL READOUT: ARCHIVE ID #1194
SUNDAY, DECEMBER 06, 2009
344 DOWNLOADS
[http://www.solaris7.com/TRO/Spaceship/ShipInfo.asp?ID=1194]

Naga Class Destroyer Upgrade

Level:Custom Level 2 / 3075 Technology:Inner Sphere  Warship Tonnage:540,000 Tons
Designer:Tigershark Armory:American mercenary development

Faction Availability

 

AeroTech 2 Vessel Technical Readout

Class/Model/Name:    Naga Class Destoryer upgrade

Tech: Inner Sphere / 3075

Vessel Type: WarShip

Rules: Level 2, Standard design

   

Mass: 540,000 tons

Inner Sphere / 3075: Ferromite 90R

K-F Drive System: KF Tri-Mark V

Length: 540 meters

Sail Diameter: 1,200 meters

Power Plant: Intersystem Class VII's Standard

Safe Thrust: 2

Maximum Thrust: 3

Armor Type: MVT CL200 Lamellor Ferro-carbide

Armament:11 NAC/2012 Light NPPC3 Killer Whale12 NL45Manufacturer:    American Arms Incorporated   Location:    Quatre BelleCommunications System:    Marcon DIYTargeting & Tracking System: Diamond XR3

Overview:

 

The Naga class destroyer first launched in 2645 intended as a replacement for the Essex. The Naga class served a respectable 50 years unitll ironicly replaced by the upgraded essex. Its successs was its low cost but that does not sell its self short. However when originaly   designed it was found it could not operate indepedently due to its dependence on ammuniton,lack of agility, and vulnerable aft section.


We learned that three naga class vessels has surrvied the fall of the star league and comstar had mothballed them over neptune. The word of blake was in the process of restoring them to working order. However since they destroyed our facilites on terra we were itching for payback so a plan was put forward that on of the three nagas in orbit around neptune would be stolen by us. One was stolen but it took moderate damage and only half its weapons were operational. After a rough ride to Quatre Belle the vessel was then evaluated besides the weapons and the damage taken in the escape the ship was in good shape.

Plans were drafted to upgrade and improve the design and then eventualy put it into production with at least 7 to ber produced within a year.

Much to our disbelief the the ship name history and battle logs     were either wiped or destroyed. Even the name of the vessel Id number and name normaly painted on the hull was faded away to the point it was ilegeable to read.

 

 

 

Capabilities:

The original Naga had a effective concentrated mix of firepower but its firepower was limited to shorter ranges and its armor was relatively thin for its class. It was dependent on its aerospace fighters to defend against enemy fighters. Its main flaw if any was it depedence on ammo for nearly   half its weapons.

To remedy its flaws weapons and armor were upgraded alowing for more powerfull weapons to be instaled. The Naga is now able to act alown. The biggest change would be the lithium fusion battieries installed to increase range of operation. Though cargo is reduced the amount of ammo carried for its autocannons is greatly increased. Though cargo is usualy used for more ammo we have removed the need for cargo space being used for the autocannon ammo but the missile ammo is still limited and thus cargo space is used.

---

Class/Model/Name: Naga Class Destoryer upgrade

Mass: 540,000 tons

Equipment:             Mass

Power Plant: Standard 64,800.00

K-F Hyperdrive: Compact (Integrity = 12) 244,350.00

Lithium Fusion Battery:   5,400.00

Jump Sail: (Integrity = 4) 57.00

Structural Integrity: 70 37,800.00

Safe Thrust: 2  

Maximum Thrust: 3  

Heat Sinks: 1,473 Double 1,068.00

Fuel & Fuel Pumps:   7,371.00

Bridge & Controls:   1,350.00

Food & Water: (220 days supply) 283.00

Armor Factor: 798 Lamellor Ferro-carbide 756.00

---

      Armor Value

      (Capital Scale)        

  Fore:   146        

  Fore Left / Right:   133 / 133        

  Aft Left / Right:   133 / 133        

  Aft:   120        

---

Equipment & Options:              

Cargo:    

   Bay 1: Fighters (16) with 6 doors 2,400.00

  Small Craft (4) with 2 doors 800.00

   Bay 2: Cargo (1) with 4 doors 101,700.00

     

Grav Decks:    

   Grav Deck #1: (55-meter diameter)  

Life Boats: 22 (7 tons each) 154

Escape Pods: 19 (7 tons each) 133

Crew and Passengers:    

   35 Officers (34 minimum)   0.00

   130 Crew (118 minimum)   0.00

   40 Gunners (38 minimum)   0.00

   52 Bay Personnel   0.00

---

Weapons & Equipment: Loc SRV MRV LRV ERV Heat Mass

3 NAC/20(300 rounds) Nose 60 60

60

180 7,620.00

2 Light NPPC Nose 14 14

14

210 2,800.00

2 NAC/20(200 rounds) FL/R 40 40

40

240 10,160.00

1 Killer Whale(20 msls) FL/R 4 4 4 4 40 2,300.00

1 Light NPPC FL/R 7 7

7

210 2,800.00

2 NL45 L/RBS 9 9 9 9 280 3,600.00

3 Light NPPC L/RBS 21 21

21

630 8,400.00

2 NAC/20(200 rounds) L/RBS 40 40

40

240 10,160.00

3 NL45 AL/R 14 14 14 14 420 5,400.00

1 Light NPPC AL/R 7 7

7

210 2,800.00

1 Killer Whale(20 msls) Aft 4 4 4 4 20 1,150.00

2 NL45 Aft 9 9 9 9 140 1,800.00

1 Lot Spare Parts (2.01%)             10,850.00

TOTALS:           2,820 540,000.00

Tons Left:             .00

---

Calculated Factors:

Total Cost: 4,755,259,368 C-Bills

Battle Value: 93,507

Cost per BV: 50,854.58

Weapon Value: 50,606 (Ratio = .54)

Damage Factors:    SRDmg = 3,392; MRDmg = 3,392; LRDmg = 2,672; ERDmg = 1,035

Maintenance Point Value:    MPV = 251,468 (45,193 Structure, 102,085 Life Support, 104,190 Weapons)

Support Points: SP = 454,500 (181% of MPV)

BattleForce2: (Not applicable)

 

 

 

User Reviews

Design Updated on 1/8/2010 1:11:09 PM

12/7/2009  LostInSpace
Slow, but it can make two jumps and has enough firepower for everything in front of it. It lacks in the rear quadrant, although that single KW launcher should allow it some criticals for retaliation. This thing screams out for docking collars, I'd want to use it as a centerpiece for a small fleet given its carrying capacity (the cargo space is "ample" by every definition of the word, even during the Star League era.) With backup, this could easily be a "command destroyer" or some such. Nice work.

12/7/2009  Lafie
Given the age and material state (one would assume miserable) of those vessels it is arguable if they would be worth the funds salvaging them as opposed to just building a new vessel to a similar set of specifications.

That having been said this isn't that bad a refit, just suffers from the same flaw as the original, ie the slow acceleration for a warship in these modern times.